April 23, 2019 posted by

iz Krivičnog zakona Socijalističke Federativne Republike Jugoslavije (KZ SFRJ ), a ne Krivičnog zakona Bosne i Hercegovine (KZ BiH). Odbrane i osudilo Albinu Terzić na tri godina zatvora prema Krivičnom zakonu Socijalističke Federativne Republike Jugoslavije (KZ SFRJ). taken from the KZ SFRJ, according to the indictment of the Cantonal Prosecuto?s office in. Tuzla no: KT: /94 from after oral and main public trial.

Author: Zutaxe Zolotaxe
Country: Cuba
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Technology
Published (Last): 15 March 2005
Pages: 157
PDF File Size: 8.55 Mb
ePub File Size: 4.90 Mb
ISBN: 125-1-11177-178-1
Downloads: 28314
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Samuzahn

Get the item you ordered or get your money back. Belgrade, Serbia Date of decision: Stojanovic says that it is very difficult to prove that someone has committed genocide, adding that in all judicial systems before the war there was not even one single case of genocide.

Stojanovic explains that in KZ SFRJ exists the crime of genocide but that the prescribed punishment is the same as for crimes against prisoners sdrj war or civilians.

See other items More Contact the seller – opens in a new window or tab and request a shipping method efrj your location. Other offers may also be available. Special financing available Select PayPal Credit at checkout to have the option to pay over time.

Registarske oznake u Jugoslaviji

The defense sfej of the accused proposed that the sentence be revoked and referred to the first instance court for review or modified by pronouncement of a more lenient sentence. They were sentenced to a total of years for crimes against humanity committed against citizens of Srebrenica in The Supreme Court reviewed all the documents and the sffj sentence at its session in absence of zk properly summoned public prosecutor and concluded the complaint to be unfounded for it did not contain significant violations of provisions of the criminal proceedings and the criminal code as well as that the facts had been established fully and correctly.

According to Stojanovic, the ICTY pronounced its first sentence for genocide against Radoslav Krstic who is, in the history of the judicial system, the first European citizen to have been convicted of sffj by an international court. Learn more – opens in new window or tab.


Stojanovic explained the difference between genocide and crime against humanity. The item you’ve selected was not added to your cart.

Albini Terzić smanjena kazna

Image not available Photos not available for this variation. Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

The District Public Prosecutor in Sombor and the defense attorneys lodged a complaint due to significant violations of the criminal proceedings, the erroneously and incompletely established facts and the decision on the penalty. As for the sentences, the Supreme Court found they were correctly measured in proportion to the offence committed and that the first instance court had correctly established and assessed all the circumstances relevant to decision on the penalty.

Sign in to check out Check out as guest. According to him, under the KZ BiH, an indictee for crimes against humanity can get up to 45 years in prison, while for genocide an indictee cannot get more than 20 years.

Feb 06, Add to watch list Remove from watch list. Email to friends Share on Facebook – opens in a new window or tab Share on Twitter – opens in a new window or tab Share on Pinterest – opens in a new window or tab.

Learn More – opens in a new window or tab Any international shipping and import charges are paid in part to Pitney Bowes Inc. European Court of Human Rights. Stojanovic says indictees of crimes against humanity are in disadvantaged position compared to others, and that they are not the same, according to the law. Subsequently, the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina adopted a dozen other appeals by abolishing the verdicts because it believes that the wrong law was applied.

Attorney Stojanovic also commented on the current state of affairs that now, indictees, and especially the citizens of Serbia can go to Serbia, where the Criminal Procedure Code does not recognise crimes against humanity, and genocide is not prosecuted because of political reasons.


Back to home page. Add to watch list. Learn more – opens in a new window or tab. Select a valid country. See terms – opens in a new window or tab. Have one to sell? Watch list is full. Skip to main content. The European Court of Human Rights found that the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina had not applied the law that is more lenient to the perpetrators in the case of Abduladhim Maktouf and Goran Damjanovic.

Mouse over to Zoom – Click to enlarge. Learn More – opens in a new window or tab. Read more about the condition. You are covered by the eBay Money Back Guarantee if you receive an item that is not as described in the listing.

Seller does not offer returns. No additional import charges at delivery! The Supreme Court concluded that the first instance court had — by a correct and comprehensive assessment of evidence and the defense of the accused — established they had commissioned the criminal offences they had been pronounced guilty of, that all the facts and circumstances constituting characteristics of a criminal offence and which refer to the mental attitude of the accused to these criminal offences had been established correctly.

This item will ship to United Statesbut the seller has not specified shipping options. There are 1 items available.

Misapplication of the Law – The Madness of Justice :: Justice Report

Genocide is hard to prove Stojanovic says that it is very difficult to prove that someone has committed genocide, adding that in all judicial systems before the war there was not even one single case of genocide. Please enter a valid Sfru Code. Stojanovic is long-time attorney in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and also works on war crimes cases.