DOD 5200.2-R PDF

November 16, 2019 posted by

DoD R, “Department o£ Defense Personnel Security Program,” December , is hereby canceled as of December 31, DoD M – National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual. ( NISPOM) DoD R – Personnel Security Program. DOD R: DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PERSONNEL SECURITY PROGRAM.

Author: Akishicage Fezil
Country: Canada
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Politics
Published (Last): 11 July 2004
Pages: 340
PDF File Size: 2.50 Mb
ePub File Size: 15.31 Mb
ISBN: 303-9-94507-639-5
Downloads: 53278
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Shaktirn

If they do not respect the rules on use of illegal substances, they may not respect the rules for protection of classified information. Adjudication standards that disqualify individuals with a significant criminal history are supported by evidence that past adult criminal behavior predicts an increased likelihood of future criminal behavior. Most scientific research and past espionage cases show that the connection between sexual behavior and personnel security is far more complex than the simple notion that “normal” sex is acceptable and “nonconforming” sexual practices are a security risk.

Information is used to meet xod requirements when granting access to information systems and to maintain 5200.2r- repository of personnel who have been granted access.

One of the keys is found in the appropriate regulations which underpin all security clearance work, and specifically in those sections dealing with extenuation and mitigation.

The adjudicator must make a conscientious effort to be sufficiently knowledgeable about the individual, to evaluate the facts fairly and objectively, to seek counsel from knowledgeable supervisors and specialists as appropriate, and to make a balanced and succinct presentation of all relevant factors in each case.

If you did received a Letter of Intent LOI to respond to a proposed suspension of eligibility or access, or if you are having problems anywhere in the process with do clearance suspension, revocation or issuance, please call my office rod soon as possible for consultation and review.

Government should be consulted when evaluating potentially disqualifying and mitigating information. 52000.2-r or inability to live within one’s means, satisfy debts or meet financial obligations may indicate poor self-control, lack of judgment or unwillingness to abide by rules and regulations, all of which can raise questions about an applicant’s reliability, trustworthiness and ability to protect classified national 5200.2-f information CNSI.

April 13,77 FR Records are electronically deleted from the database.

DOD Adjudicative Elements – Security Clearance

This includes protecting controlled but unclassified information such as For Official Use Only FOUOproprietary, export-controlled or privacy information. Passwords and User IDs are used to control access to the system data, and procedures are in place to deter and detect browsing and unauthorized access.

Related Posts (10)  BOG GOVORI MEHER BABA PDF

Records include identifying information: Self-control, social maturity, strength of character and overall psychological adjustment are more important security indicators than the specific sexual practices in which people engage.

An individual who is financially overextended is at risk of having to engage in illegal acts to generate funds. The motivation for the conduct. It is different with juveniles, however. Know which questions will not 52200.2-r asked. Those who abuse alcohol are more likely than others to engage in high-risk, thoughtless or violent behaviors. The term information technology systems as used here includes all computer hardware, software, firmware, networks and data used for the communication, transmission, processing, manipulation, storage or protection of information.

Military Security Clearances Military deployments almost always require that the service member A preference for a foreign entity may cause a person to make decisions that are contrary 5200.2-r the interests of the United States.

The Personal Conduct adjudicative guideline covers unreliable or untrustworthy behavior not considered under other guidelines, or which falls below the threshold for action under any other single guideline. Noncompliance with rules, procedures, guidelines or regulations pertaining to information technology systems may raise security concerns about an individual’s reliability and trustworthiness, calling into question the willingness or ability to properly protect sensitive systems, networks and information.

Most government organizations and private businesses do not know and cannot measure accurately how much they suffer from theft in the workplace by employees or outsiders. As it becomes easier for people to access computer databases, ease of use means ease of abuse.

The use of illegal drugs or the misuse of prescription drugs can raise questions about an applicant’s reliability and trustworthiness since these actions impair judgment and suggest an inability or unwillingness to comply 5200.2-e laws, rules and regulations. Owing to the magnitude of problems that can be caused by misuse of computer systems, all agencies have a vested interest in maintaining a work environment that fosters high standards of computer security.

This increases the risk of unauthorized disclosure of classified information due to impulsive or careless behavior. Adjudications Certain positions within DoD entail duties of such a sensitive nature, including access to classified information, that the misconduct, malfeasance or nonfeasance of an incumbent in any such position could result in an unacceptably adverse impact upon the national security of the United States.

It follows that such information will be known to few people, and that these are likely to be close associates such as family members, lovers, best friends, teammates or close work 5200.2-g. Handling Protected 5200.2–r Deliberate or negligent failure to comply with rules and regulations for protecting classified or other sensitive information raises doubt about an individual’s trustworthiness, judgment, reliability or willingness and ability to safeguard such information and is a serious security concern.

Related Posts (10)  KING LEARY PAUL QUARRINGTON PDF

DoD R, “Personnel Security Program,” 1/

Evidence of ability to maintain commitments to people or organizations is a strong plus in the whole-person do. Organizations are vulnerable to a wide variety of crimes including embezzlement, procurement fraud, sabotage of computer systems and theft of government property.

They apply to persons being considered for initial or continued eligibility for access to classified information, to include sensitive compartmented information SCI and special access programs SAPsand are to be used by government departments and agencies in do final clearance determinations.

A person with 5200.2-f qualities may not be a security risk even if, for example, he or she were to develop an alcohol problem or serious financial debt. Each case must be judged on its own merits and final determination remains the responsibility of the specific department or agency.

Three positive qualities, among others, are associated with trustworthiness, reliability and being an overall good security risk. This site uses cookies. Government employee or member of the military is a violation of this presidential order.

They seldom make impulsive decisions that they regret later. A personnel security clearance is an administrative determination by a certified adjudicator that an individual vod eligible under national security standards for access to classified information.

DOD 5200.2-R PDF

Eligibility for access to classified information is predicated upon the individual meeting these personnel security guidelines. Government, prevent others from exercising their constitutional rights or to harm deliberately the United States. It is not prohibited for a U. Most, if not all, of these topics or issues can be mitigated and be made to appear less severe. Available, reliable information about the person, past and present, favorable and unfavorable, should be considered in reaching a determination.

Candidates for security clearance are evaluated under a system which provides a balanced assessment of affirmative or positive qualities as well as potentially disqualifying behaviors.